Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Tomasz Kaminski
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:13 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 09:55, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Wakely > wrote: > >> > >> On 16/04/25 10:37 +0200, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > >> >Just to clarify, we still will be missing the

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 10:38, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:17 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On 16/04/25 09:13 +0200, Tomasz Kamiński wrote: >> >This patch implements formatter specializations for pair and tuple form >> >P2286R8. In addition using 'm` and range_forma

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Tomasz Kaminski
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:17 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 16/04/25 09:13 +0200, Tomasz Kamiński wrote: > >This patch implements formatter specializations for pair and tuple form > >P2286R8. In addition using 'm` and range_format::map (from P2585R1) for > >ranges are now supported. > > > >The f

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 16/04/25 09:13 +0200, Tomasz Kamiński wrote: This patch implements formatter specializations for pair and tuple form P2286R8. In addition using 'm` and range_format::map (from P2585R1) for ranges are now supported. The formatters for pairs and tuples whose corresponding elements are the same

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 09:55, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On 16/04/25 10:37 +0200, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: >> >Just to clarify, we still will be missing the formatter for adaptors >> >(stack, queue, piority_queue). >> >> Yes, but I d

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Tomasz Kaminski
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 16/04/25 10:37 +0200, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > >Just to clarify, we still will be missing the formatter for adaptors > >(stack, queue, piority_queue). > > Yes, but I doubt most people want to use those :-) > We are good as long as vecto

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 16/04/25 10:37 +0200, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: Just to clarify, we still will be missing the formatter for adaptors (stack, queue, piority_queue). Yes, but I doubt most people want to use those :-)

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Tomasz Kaminski
Just to clarify, we still will be missing the formatter for adaptors (stack, queue, piority_queue). On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:04 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 08:15, Tomasz Kamiński wrote: > > > > This patch implements formatter specializations for pair and tuple form > >

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 08:15, Tomasz Kamiński wrote: > > This patch implements formatter specializations for pair and tuple form > P2286R8. In addition using 'm` and range_format::map (from P2585R1) for > ranges are now supported. > > The formatters for pairs and tuples whose corresponding element

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Implement formatters for pair and tuple [PR109162]

2025-04-16 Thread Tomasz Kaminski
There are few whitespace changes that are caused by me mass removing spaces that are followed by tabs. They seem to affect only the code that was recently added by me in debug string and range support, so I think it is ok to keep them. On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:16 AM Tomasz Kamiński wrote: > Thi