Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test

2013-01-22 Thread Andi Kleen
> Now in the form of a tested patch (regtested on x86_64-linux and > i686-linux). Ok for trunk? > > dg-additional-options unfortunately isn't supported in libstdc++ testsuite, > so had to use second dg-options, and also the \(, \) were wrong and resulted > in no matches. Looks good to me (but ca

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test

2013-01-22 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 22 January 2013 17:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Now in the form of a tested patch (regtested on x86_64-linux and > i686-linux). Ok for trunk? OK, thanks. > dg-additional-options unfortunately isn't supported in libstdc++ testsuite, > so had to use second dg-options, and also the \(, \) were w