Re: [PATCH] libgcobol: C++-ify the configuration steps.

2025-03-24 Thread Iain Sandoe
> On 24 Mar 2025, at 16:38, Robert Dubner wrote: > > How about you create the new patch and just edit out the regenerated > configure before sending the e-mail? Typing "autoreconf" isn't hard. OK. I can do that (historically that is what we always have done, but now we have CI infrastructure

Re: [PATCH] libgcobol: C++-ify the configuration steps.

2025-03-24 Thread Iain Sandoe
> On 24 Mar 2025, at 16:41, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > > >> On 24 Mar 2025, at 16:38, Robert Dubner wrote: >> >> How about you create the new patch and just edit out the regenerated >> configure before sending the e-mail? Typing "autoreconf" isn't hard. > > OK. I can do that (historically tha

RE: [PATCH] libgcobol: C++-ify the configuration steps.

2025-03-24 Thread Robert Dubner
K. Lowden ; GCC Patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgcobol: C++-ify the configuration steps. > > Hi > > > On 24 Mar 2025, at 14:50, Robert Dubner wrote: > > > > No I am not sure what to do. > > > > I tried to apply this patch, both the the

Re: [PATCH] libgcobol: C++-ify the configuration steps.

2025-03-24 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi > On 24 Mar 2025, at 14:50, Robert Dubner wrote: > > No I am not sure what to do. > > I tried to apply this patch, both the the master branch and to one of my > working copies. My apologies, some of what I am doing depends on the work that you, Richi and Jakub have been doing, and so I ha