Marek Polacek writes:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:26:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [...]
>> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/Wheader-guard-1-1.h.jj2024-09-11
>> 19:26:39.912834079 +0200
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/Wheader-guard-1-1.h 2024-09-11
>> 19:02:02.414054285
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:26:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following patch implements the clang -Wheader-guard warning, which warns
> if a valid multiple inclusion header guard's #ifndef/#if !defined directive
> is immediately (no other non-line directives nor other (non-comment)
On Thu, 2024-09-12 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:12:26AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > We were chatting on IRC about how it would be nice to be able to
> > use
> > %qs in libcppp diagnostics; here is an example (rather than using
> > \"%s\").
>
> Yeah, I'm wor
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:12:26AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> We were chatting on IRC about how it would be nice to be able to use
> %qs in libcppp diagnostics; here is an example (rather than using
> \"%s\").
Yeah, I'm working on a patch for that.
> Not a blocker, but it occurs to me that ide
On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 23:26 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following patch implements the clang -Wheader-guard warning,
> which warns
> if a valid multiple inclusion header guard's #ifndef/#if !defined
> directive
> is immediately (no other non-line directives nor other (non-comment)
>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:28 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The following patch implements the clang -Wheader-guard warning, which warns
> if a valid multiple inclusion header guard's #ifndef/#if !defined directive
> is immediately (no other non-line directives nor other (non-comment)
> token
