Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 02:17:46PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 15 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 03:34:07PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> >> This patch just introduces a form of dumping of widest in
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 02:17:46PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 15 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 03:34:07PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >> This patch just introduces a form of dumping of widest ints that only
> >> have zeros in the lowest 128 bits so
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 02:33:23PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> ISTR at least CCP _prints_ wide_int (or it's tree form), not widest_int
> (but the lattice has widest_int indeed). But CCP knows the precision
> of the lattice entry (which is for an SSA name), possibly IPA CP
> doesn't.
ipcp_bits_
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 01:56:25PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 03:34:07PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > > > This patch just introduces a form of dumping of widest ints th
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 01:56:25PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 03:34:07PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > > This patch just introduces a form of dumping of widest ints that only
> > > have zeros in the lowest 128 bits so th
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 03:34:07PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> This patch just introduces a form of dumping of widest ints that only
>> have zeros in the lowest 128 bits so that instead of printing
>> thousands of f's the output looks like:
>>
>>
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 03:34:07PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > This patch just introduces a form of dumping of widest ints that only
> > have zeros in the lowest 128 bits so that instead of printing
> > thousands of f's the output looks like:
> >
>