On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> As for the attribute, I am honestly not too sure about what to do, as clang
> is
> not consistent in with its own indexing, be it with the unknown values, or
> with
> 'this'. I've tried to remain consistent with GCC's indexing style. I
Dne 28. 04. 25 v 10:58 Jakub Jelinek napsal(a):
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 11:56:21AM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
* builtin-attrs.def (0): New int list.
This is just weird. Write
* builtin-attrs.def: Add DEF_LIST_INT_INT (0,2).
?
+DEF_CALLBACK_ATTRIBUTE(GOMP, 1, 0)
+DEF_CALLBACK_
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 11:56:21AM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> * builtin-attrs.def (0): New int list.
This is just weird. Write
* builtin-attrs.def: Add DEF_LIST_INT_INT (0,2).
?
> +DEF_CALLBACK_ATTRIBUTE(GOMP, 1, 0)
> +DEF_CALLBACK_ATTRIBUTE(GOMP, 1, 2)
> +DEF_CALLBACK_ATTRIBUTE(O
Lambdas have crossed my mind, but I have not yet had the time to look
thoroughly into their implementation and the issues they face. I do plan
to look into them once I am done with some incremental improvements for
the attribute and callback edges, as lambdas seem like a good candidate
for this
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 2:58 AM Josef Melcr wrote:
>
> This patch enables constant propagation to outlined OpenMP kernels and
> improves support for optimizing callback functions in general. It
> implements the attribute 'callback' as found in clang, though argument
> numbering is a bit different,
