Hello,
On 7/11/25 6:47 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hello,
and sorry for a rather late reaction. First and foremost, thanks for
the patch, I think it is great to have this finally implemented and
although I would like to see a couple things changed, I think the patch
is quite close to what could b
Hello,
and sorry for a rather late reaction. First and foremost, thanks for
the patch, I think it is great to have this finally implemented and
although I would like to see a couple things changed, I think the patch
is quite close to what could be committed to gcc master.
After my first pass thr
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:14:53PM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> Certainly :) I am sorry about my lack of activity in the last two months,
> I've been really busy, first with the thesis and now with studying for the
> state finals. I will hopefully wrap up these academic duties this Thursday
> and I
On 6/16/25 18:25, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:56:57AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
As for the attribute, I am honestly not too sure about what to do, as c
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:56:57AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> > > > > As for the attribute, I am honestly not too sure about what to do, as
> > > > > clang
>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:56:57AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> > > > As for the attribute, I am honestly not too sure about what to do, as
> > > > clang
> > > > is
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:56:57AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> > > As for the attribute, I am honestly not too sure about what to do, as
> > > clang
> > > is
> > > not consistent in with its own indexing, be it with the unknown v
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:56:57AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> > As for the attribute, I am honestly not too sure about what to do, as clang
> > is
> > not consistent in with its own indexing, be it with the unknown values, or
> > wit
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> As for the attribute, I am honestly not too sure about what to do, as clang
> is
> not consistent in with its own indexing, be it with the unknown values, or
> with
> 'this'. I've tried to remain consistent with GCC's indexing style. I
Dne 28. 04. 25 v 10:58 Jakub Jelinek napsal(a):
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 11:56:21AM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
* builtin-attrs.def (0): New int list.
This is just weird. Write
* builtin-attrs.def: Add DEF_LIST_INT_INT (0,2).
?
+DEF_CALLBACK_ATTRIBUTE(GOMP, 1, 0)
+DEF_CALLBACK_
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 11:56:21AM +0200, Josef Melcr wrote:
> * builtin-attrs.def (0): New int list.
This is just weird. Write
* builtin-attrs.def: Add DEF_LIST_INT_INT (0,2).
?
> +DEF_CALLBACK_ATTRIBUTE(GOMP, 1, 0)
> +DEF_CALLBACK_ATTRIBUTE(GOMP, 1, 2)
> +DEF_CALLBACK_ATTRIBUTE(O
Lambdas have crossed my mind, but I have not yet had the time to look
thoroughly into their implementation and the issues they face. I do plan
to look into them once I am done with some incremental improvements for
the attribute and callback edges, as lambdas seem like a good candidate
for this
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 2:58 AM Josef Melcr wrote:
>
> This patch enables constant propagation to outlined OpenMP kernels and
> improves support for optimizing callback functions in general. It
> implements the attribute 'callback' as found in clang, though argument
> numbering is a bit different,
13 matches
Mail list logo
