On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 5:32 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 8/12/21 5:26 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Will it hurt if they have proper feature_priorities you added?
>
> No. They are unused, by we should use the proper priorities.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (cpu_indicator_init): Add s
PING^1
On 8/13/21 15:41, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 1:10 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 8/12/21 7:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
What happens for arch=x86-64-v5?
pr101696.c:5:55: error: bad value (‘x86-64-v5’) for ‘target("arch=")’ attribute
5 | __attribute__ ((target ("arch=x86-64-v5
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 1:10 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 8/12/21 7:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > What happens for arch=x86-64-v5?
>
> pr101696.c:5:55: error: bad value (‘x86-64-v5’) for ‘target("arch=")’
> attribute
>
> 5 | __attribute__ ((target ("arch=x86-64-v5"))) void foo () {
> __builti
On 8/12/21 7:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
What happens for arch=x86-64-v5?
pr101696.c:5:55: error: bad value (‘x86-64-v5’) for ‘target("arch=")’ attribute
5 | __attribute__ ((target ("arch=x86-64-v5"))) void foo () { __builtin_printf
("arch=x86-64-v4\n"); }
|
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 8:31 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 8/12/21 5:26 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Will it hurt if they have proper feature_priorities you added?
>
> No. They are unused, by we should use the proper priorities.
>
> Martin
+ const char *arch_name = attrs_str + strlen ("arch=");
+
On 8/12/21 5:26 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Will it hurt if they have proper feature_priorities you added?
No. They are unused, by we should use the proper priorities.
Martin
>From 5a2f40394390f8bfca0724d6e371b5105d01c027 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:20:43 +020
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 8:22 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 8/12/21 4:51 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 7:39 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/12/21 4:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> Please send out the v2 patch with the enclosed patch. I added some tests.
> >>
> >> Thanks, there'
On 8/12/21 4:51 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 7:39 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 8/12/21 4:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Please send out the v2 patch with the enclosed patch. I added some tests.
Thanks, there's patch which includes your changes.
Martin
diff --git a/gcc/common/config/i3
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 7:39 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 8/12/21 4:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Please send out the v2 patch with the enclosed patch. I added some tests.
>
> Thanks, there's patch which includes your changes.
>
> Martin
diff --git a/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-isas.h
b/gcc/common/
On 8/12/21 4:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Please send out the v2 patch with the enclosed patch. I added some tests.
Thanks, there's patch which includes your changes.
Martin
>From 22ab27eab643d99addd00c11f62eca891e11ac08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:20:43 +0
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 7:12 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
> I modified the H.J. patch draft.
Please send out the v2 patch with the enclosed patch. I added some tests.
> @H.J. Can you please verify the newly added 'feature_prio
11 matches
Mail list logo
