Hi!
On 2020-06-08T13:49:55+0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le lun. 08 juin 2020 13:36:55 +0200, a ecrit:
>> Thomas Schwinge, le lun. 08 juin 2020 12:15:12 +0200, a ecrit:
>> > Which GCC branches would you like this on?
>>
>> Ideally it's be backported to gcc 9 and 10, so that it l
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 08 juin 2020 13:36:55 +0200, a ecrit:
> Thomas Schwinge, le lun. 08 juin 2020 12:15:12 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Which GCC branches would you like this on?
>
> Ideally it's be backported to gcc 9 and 10, so that it lands naturally
> in the Debian packages without having to bothe
Thomas Schwinge, le lun. 08 juin 2020 12:15:12 +0200, a ecrit:
> I'm not currently set up to test this, but I'll assume you have.
Sure :)
> Which GCC branches would you like this on?
Ideally it's be backported to gcc 9 and 10, so that it lands naturally
in the Debian packages without having to b
Hi Samuel!
On 2020-05-29T13:46:50+0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> libgcc is currently missing the support for unwinding over signal
> trampolines on GNU/Hurd.
ACK. Has been on my long TODO list for a long time. ;-)
> The attached patch implements it.
Thanks!
I'm not intimately familiar with
Hello,
Any news on this?
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le ven. 29 mai 2020 13:46:50 +0200, a ecrit:
> Hello,
>
> libgcc is currently missing the support for unwinding over signal
> trampolines on GNU/Hurd. The attached patch implements it.
>
> Samuel
> hurd: libgcc unwinding support over signal tra
