On 2/24/20 3:50 PM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
I've had a quick look and there doesn't appear to be a test for using
a non-constant for kind arguments. I think a proper set of tests for
invalid kind arguments that covers declarations and intrinsic
arguments should be added that is separate from this
On 24/02/2020 14:34, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hi Mark,
Might need
gfc_reduce_init_expr (e);
here. The kind type parameter should be a constant expression.
Not needed. I've also checked use of the kind argument, it is
evidently checked elsewhere: if k is allowed to be implicitly
de
Hi Mark,
Might need
gfc_reduce_init_expr (e);
here. The kind type parameter should be a constant expression.
Not needed. I've also checked use of the kind argument, it is evidently
checked elsewhere: if k is allowed to be implicitly declared and is used
as the kind argument error
**ping**
The following was a reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2020-02/msg00042.html
see response below. OK to commit?
On 11/02/2020 15:23, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:10:41PM +, Mark Eggleston wrote:
Please find attached a patch for PR93484. The original author
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:10:41PM +, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> Please find attached a patch for PR93484. The original author is Steve
> Kargl. I have added the test cases.
>
> OK for master?
I obviously think the patch is ok, but I'll let someone else review it.
> Steven G. Kargl
>
>
