Re: [PATCH] fortran/66057 -- detect malformed GENERIC statement

2015-05-18 Thread FX
> Yes, the patch appears to catch those as well. Then: OK to commit. Thanks! FX

Re: [PATCH] fortran/66057 -- detect malformed GENERIC statement

2015-05-18 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:37:24PM +0200, FX wrote: > Does it also catch the other cases shown in the PR? Things like: > > generic :: 2 > generic :: 2 = > generic :: 1 => x > generic :: ? > Yes, the patch appears to catch those as well. -- Steve

Re: [PATCH] fortran/66057 -- detect malformed GENERIC statement

2015-05-15 Thread FX
Does it also catch the other cases shown in the PR? Things like: generic :: 2 generic :: 2 = generic :: 1 => x generic :: ? etc. OK if so. If not, maybe it’s worth adding them at the same time? FX