Re: [PATCH] fortran/50514 -- Fix static chekcing of ISHFT[C] arguments.

2011-10-18 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 10/17/2011 07:02 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:22:03PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: I am not so happy with complete test replacements. How about adding it as new test case? Well, the old testcase is [...] The only line that would survive is the first line, which is covere

Re: [PATCH] fortran/50514 -- Fix static chekcing of ISHFT[C] arguments.

2011-10-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:22:03PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > On 10/15/2011 11:21 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > >OK for trunk? > > > >2011-10-15 Steven G. Kargl > > > > * gfortran.dg/ishft_3.f90: Update test. > > I am not so happy with complete test replacements. How about adding it > as new

Re: [PATCH] fortran/50514 -- Fix static chekcing of ISHFT[C] arguments.

2011-10-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 10/15/2011 11:21 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: OK for trunk? 2011-10-15 Steven G. Kargl * gfortran.dg/ishft_3.f90: Update test. I am not so happy with complete test replacements. How about adding it as new test case? 2011-10-15 Steven G. Kargl * check.c (less_than_bitsize