> attached the new patch. OK for check in?
OK,
thanks!
Honza
attached the new patch. OK for check in?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > builtin_expect should be a NOP in size_estimation. Indeed, the call
>> > stmt itself is 0 weight in size and time. But it may introduce
>> > an extra relation expr which has non-zero siz
> > Hi,
> >
> > builtin_expect should be a NOP in size_estimation. Indeed, the call
> > stmt itself is 0 weight in size and time. But it may introduce
> > an extra relation expr which has non-zero size/time. The end result
> > is: for w/ and w/o builtin_expect, we have different size/time estimatio
ping.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Rong Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> builtin_expect should be a NOP in size_estimation. Indeed, the call
> stmt itself is 0 weight in size and time. But it may introduce
> an extra relation expr which has non-zero size/time. The end result
> is: for w/ and w/o builtin_e
