Diego Novillo wrote:
...
> Feel free to commit any of the patches in this series of typo fixes
> you just posted.
Thanks.
Done, with this:
From 7d5f43492809f2d96149853941bc8e0a9e7ecd10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:31:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix doubled-
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:40, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
I think these are obvious.
>>>
>>> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval
>>
>> Well, techni
On Apr 18, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> If you hadn't said anything, I would have committed those typo fixes
> by now, based on what I perceived as your review/approval and on my
> reading of this part of http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html:
>
>Free for all
>
>The following change
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:40:03PM CEST:
> Mike Stump wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> >> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
> >>> I think these are obvious.
> >>
> >> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit appr
Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> I think these are obvious.
>>
>> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval
>
> Well, technically, it means nothing... It only means something if the
>
On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
>> I think these are obvious.
>
> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval
Well, technically, it means nothing... It only means something if the
maintainer agrees with me,
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote:
> I think these are obvious.
Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval,
Jim.
Gerald
On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:18 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> While most of these are in comments, the corrections
> in gcc/tree-cfg.c and gcc/config/sh/constraints.md are in strings.
> The former at least is marked for translation, and hence appears
> in every .po file.
I think these are obvious.
>
