Re: [PATCH] doc: invoke: RISC-V: Clean up the -mstrict-align wording

On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 01:25:01 PST (-0800), sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote: On Feb 07 2022, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index 0ebe538ccdc..5e8af05e359 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi @@ -27702,7 +27702,7 @@ integer load/stor

Re: [PATCH] doc: invoke: RISC-V: Clean up the -mstrict-align wording

On Feb 07 2022, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > index 0ebe538ccdc..5e8af05e359 100644 > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > @@ -27702,7 +27702,7 @@ integer load/stores only. > @item -mstrict-align > @itemx -mno-strict-align >

Re: [PATCH] doc: invoke: RISC-V: Clean up the -mstrict-align wording

LGTM, thanks :) On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 12:30 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > The polarity of do/do not was reversed for this option when compored to > the rest of them. This seems to have been copied from PowerPC, when the > polarity of the arguments in the docs was reversed (presumably to match >