On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 03:51:07PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:45:35AM -0500, Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > -extern const unsigned char tree_code_length[];
> > > +
> > > +#define DEFTREECODE(SYM, NAME, TYPE, LENGTH) LENGTH,
> > > +#define EN
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:45:35AM -0500, Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > -extern const unsigned char tree_code_length[];
> > +
> > +#define DEFTREECODE(SYM, NAME, TYPE, LENGTH) LENGTH,
> > +#define END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES 0,
> > +constexpr unsigned char tree_code_length[] = {
> > +#include
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
> From: Andrew Pinski
>
> Since we use C++11 by default now, we can
> use constexpr for some const decls in tree-core.h.
>
> This patch does that and it allows for better optimizations
> of GCC code with checking enabled and without LTO.
>
On 11/18/22 19:53, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:06 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 11/18/22 11:05, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Andrew Pinski
Since we use C++11 by default now, we can
use constexpr for some const decls in tree-core.h.
This patch does t
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:06 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/22 11:05, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > From: Andrew Pinski
> >
> > Since we use C++11 by default now, we can
> > use constexpr for some const decls in tree-core.h.
> >
> > This patch does that and it allows f
On 11/18/22 11:05, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Andrew Pinski
Since we use C++11 by default now, we can
use constexpr for some const decls in tree-core.h.
This patch does that and it allows for better optimizations
of GCC code with checking enabled and without LTO.
For an example
