On 07.06.2022 09:41, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 08:12:26AM +0200, Jan Beulich via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> This regressed
>>> Executing on host: /home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/xgcc
>>> -B/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/ -fdiagnostics-plain-output -flto -g
>>> -gsplit-dwarf
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 08:12:26AM +0200, Jan Beulich via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > This regressed
> > Executing on host: /home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/xgcc
> > -B/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/ -fdiagnostics-plain-output -flto -g
> > -gsplit-dwarf -c -o c_lto_pr83719_0.o
> > /home/jakub/src
On 04.06.2022 10:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Jan Beulich via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Using the system objcopy is wrong when other configure checks have
>> probed a different set of binutils (I've noticed the problem on a system
>> where the base objcopy can't
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Jan Beulich via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Using the system objcopy is wrong when other configure checks have
> probed a different set of binutils (I've noticed the problem on a system
> where the base objcopy can't deal with compressed debug sections).
> Arrange
On Jun 2, 2022, Jan Beulich via Gcc-patches wrote:
> * Makefile.in (ORIGINAL_OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET): New.
> * configure.ac: Check for objcopy, producing
> ORIGINAL_OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET.
> * configure: Update accordingly.
> * exec-tool.in (ORIGINAL_OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET): Ne
