On Tue, 18 May 2021, David Lamparter wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 06:09:35PM +0200, David Lamparter wrote:
> > The TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT() here was, for casts to a typedef'd type name,
> > resulting in all information about the typedef's involvement getting
> > lost. This drops necessary informat
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 06:09:35PM +0200, David Lamparter wrote:
> The TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT() here was, for casts to a typedef'd type name,
> resulting in all information about the typedef's involvement getting
> lost. This drops necessary information for warnings and can make them
> confusing or eve
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:02:16PM +0100, David Lamparter wrote:
> Also, in seeing your response re. the volatile, it occured to me that
> stripping qualifiers on a typedef and still calling it the typedef is
> unhelpful. Ideally, my goal is:
>
> typedef int i;
> typedef const int ci;
> typeof((i
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:01:39AM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 3/9/21 6:46 PM, David Lamparter wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:28:15AM +0100, David Lamparter wrote:
> >> The TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT() here was, for casts to a typedef'd type name,
> >> resulting in all information about the typed
On 3/9/21 6:46 PM, David Lamparter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:28:15AM +0100, David Lamparter wrote:
The TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT() here was, for casts to a typedef'd type name,
resulting in all information about the typedef's involvement getting
lost. This drops necessary information for warnin
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:28:15AM +0100, David Lamparter wrote:
> The TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT() here was, for casts to a typedef'd type name,
> resulting in all information about the typedef's involvement getting
> lost. This drops necessary information for warnings and can make them
> confusing or eve
