Re: [PATCH] c++: missing SFINAE in grok_array_decl [PR111493]

2023-09-20 Thread Jason Merrill
On 9/20/23 11:03, Patrick Palka wrote: On Wed, 20 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- This fixes some missed SFINAE in grok_array_decl when checking a C++23 multidimensional subscript operator expression. Not

Re: [PATCH] c++: missing SFINAE in grok_array_decl [PR111493]

2023-09-20 Thread Patrick Palka
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for > trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > This fixes some missed SFINAE in grok_array_decl when checking a C++23 > multidimensional subscript operator expression. > > Note the existing pedwarn c

Re: [PATCH] c++: missing SFINAE in grok_array_decl [PR111493]

2023-09-20 Thread Patrick Palka
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for > trunk? ... and perhaps 13? > > -- >8 -- > > This fixes some missed SFINAE in grok_array_decl when checking a C++23 > multidimensional subscript operator expression. > > Note