On 9/7/23 16:12, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 9/6/23 18:07, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk? This cache apparently has a 98% hit rate for TYPE_HAS_CONVERSION
types on some test files.
Doe
On Thu, 7 Sep 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/6/23 18:07, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
> > trunk? This cache apparently has a 98% hit rate for TYPE_HAS_CONVERSION
> > types on some test files.
>
> Does it make a measurable di
On 9/6/23 18:07, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk? This cache apparently has a 98% hit rate for TYPE_HAS_CONVERSION
types on some test files.
Does it make a measurable difference in compile time?
+/* A cache of the result of