> On Jan 5, 2021, at 8:54 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
>
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>
>> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>>
>> ...
>>>
>>> 2) We just saw 100reds of insns being dublicated, basically the whole
>>> machine description except for the few insns that le
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>
>>
>> Finally, some general remarks:
>
> The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed
> whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first three steps of
> case #2), and fixed any regression fallout (for ATmeg
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 20:31, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> > Segher Boessenkool schrieb:
> > >On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > >>>On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> > >>> wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool schrieb:
> >On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> >>>On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> >>> wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj vi
Segher Boessenkool schrieb:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via
Gcc-patches wrote:
The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via
> > Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed
>
> On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via
> Gcc-patches wrote:
>> The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed
>> whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first t
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via
Gcc-patches wrote:
> The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed
> whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first three steps of
> case #2), and fixed any regression fallout (for ATmega128).
>
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:51, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> > (I really tried to follow this
> https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches,
> > but my stomach)
> >
> > Hi there all!
> >
> > The attached patch contains a new avr-backend, stripped from cc0.
> >
> > The author is gcc maintainer Snethil