Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2021-01-05 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc-patches
> On Jan 5, 2021, at 8:54 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes: > >> Georg-Johann Lay writes: >> >> ... >>> >>> 2) We just saw 100reds of insns being dublicated, basically the whole >>> machine description except for the few insns that le

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2021-01-05 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes: > Georg-Johann Lay writes: > >> >> Finally, some general remarks: > > The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed > whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first three steps of > case #2), and fixed any regression fallout (for ATmeg

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2020-12-18 Thread abebeos via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 20:31, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > Segher Boessenkool schrieb: > > >On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > > >>>On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool > > >>> wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2020-12-18 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Segher Boessenkool schrieb: > >On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > >>>On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool > >>> wrote: > >>>On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj vi

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2020-12-18 Thread Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc-patches
Segher Boessenkool schrieb: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches wrote: The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2020-12-18 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via > > Gcc-patches wrote: > >> The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed >

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2020-12-17 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc-patches
> On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > Hi! > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via > Gcc-patches wrote: >> The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed >> whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first t

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2020-12-17 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches wrote: > The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed > whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first three steps of > case #2), and fixed any regression fallout (for ATmega128). >

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2020-12-13 Thread abebeos via Gcc-patches
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:51, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > (I really tried to follow this > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches, > > but my stomach) > > > > Hi there all! > > > > The attached patch contains a new avr-backend, stripped from cc0. > > > > The author is gcc maintainer Snethil