"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> Here is the latest version of the patch, I wasn't sure whether Richard's
> 'LGTM with...' was meant as a conditional OK and together with the
> changes suggested by Andrew I thought I'd ask again, OK for trunk?
>
>
> As per the AArch64 ISA FEAT_SME does not requi
Here is the latest version of the patch, I wasn't sure whether Richard's
'LGTM with...' was meant as a conditional OK and together with the
changes suggested by Andrew I thought I'd ask again, OK for trunk?
As per the AArch64 ISA FEAT_SME does not require FEAT_SVE2. However, we
don't support
Thanks for the suggestions.
On 14/03/2025 21:43, Andrew Carlotti wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:10:07PM +, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Apologies for the delay, had been waiting on some other relevant patches to
go in to make sure we didn't break any valid existing behaviours. It should
a
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:10:07PM +, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> Apologies for the delay, had been waiting on some other relevant patches to
> go in to make sure we didn't break any valid existing behaviours. It should
> all be working properly now. I think I've also addressed all your comme
On 14/03/2025 09:59, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/no-sve-with-sme-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/no-sve-with-sme-3.c
new file mode 100644
index
..7a873fa2396a4129225ba
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> index
> 4fbb4cda101ebd14891a3ad80aa5b1bc069b45c6..3754e468a05b3ae554b71adb4cf60068d5249507
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> @@ -22068,7 +22068,8 @@ Enable the Pointer Authe
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> Apologies for the delay, had been waiting on some other relevant patches
> to go in to make sure we didn't break any valid existing behaviours. It
> should all be working properly now. I think I've also addressed all your
> comments. Most notable change is that
