On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:54 PM Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We had not noticed that after g:299a8e2dc667e795991bc439d2cad5ea5bd379e2 the
> FP8FMA and FP8DOT4 features aren't implied by FP8FMA. The intent is for
> -mcpu=olympus to support all of them.
> Fix the definition to include the r
Andrew Carlotti writes:
> We agreed with LLVM developer to not enforce the architectural
> dependencies between fp8 multiplication features, and they have already
> been removed from LLVM and Binutils. Remove them from GCC as well.
>
>
>
> I have bootstrapped and regression tested this. There ar
