Re: [PATCH] __builtin_assume_aligned

2011-07-08 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Richard Guenther wrote: >> Thanks, here is what I've committed after bootstrapping/regtesting >> again on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. > Thanks Jakub. Probably worth an entry in changes.html. Yes, please. :-) Gerald

Re: [PATCH] __builtin_assume_aligned

2011-06-28 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17:40PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: >> Ok if you remove the builtins.c folding and instead verify arguments >> from check_builtin_function_arguments. > > Thanks, here is what I've committed after bootstrapping/re

Re: [PATCH] __builtin_assume_aligned

2011-06-27 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17:40PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > Ok if you remove the builtins.c folding and instead verify arguments > from check_builtin_function_arguments. Thanks, here is what I've committed after bootstrapping/regtesting again on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. 2011-06-27 Ja

Re: [PATCH] __builtin_assume_aligned

2011-06-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > This patch introduces a new extension, to hint the compiler > that a pointer is guaranteed to be somehow aligned (or misaligned). > It is designed as a pass-thru builtin which just returns its first > argument, so that it is more obvi