On 1/8/20 11:08 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 1/7/20 11:27 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Which is fine. Apparently there are just few usages of manual printing
of a symtab node and order like:
fprintf (f,
"%*s%s/%i %s\n%*s freq:%4.2f",
indent, "", callee->name (), calle
> On 1/7/20 11:27 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Which is fine. Apparently there are just few usages of manual printing
> > of a symtab node and order like:
> >
> > fprintf (f,
> > "%*s%s/%i %s\n%*s freq:%4.2f",
> > indent, "", callee->name (), callee->order,
> >
> >
On 1/7/20 11:27 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Which is fine. Apparently there are just few usages of manual printing
of a symtab node and order like:
fprintf (f,
"%*s%s/%i %s\n%*s freq:%4.2f",
indent, "", callee->name (), callee->order,
I can replace these with symtab_
On 1/7/20 11:12 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
I try to use just the symtab_order numbers whenever I can to avoid
confusion
Which is fine. Apparently there are just few usages of manual printing
of a symtab node and order like:
fprintf (f,
"%*s%s/%i %s\n%*s freq:%4.2f",
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 07 2020, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I would like to make cgraph_node names consistent in cgraph_node::dump.
>
I try to use just the symtab_order numbers whenever I can to avoid
confusion but - at least if we care about the non-asm name at all -
shouldn't the dump have both the
