Re: [PATCH] Update documentation of -Wshadow

2019-10-06 Thread Bernd Edlinger
Hi Sandra, On 10/6/19 10:23 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 10/3/19 9:16 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've noticed that the documentation of -Wshadow=x has some >> missing bits, and I want to add an negative example to >> -Wshadow=compatble-local. >> >> >> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on

Re: [PATCH] Update documentation of -Wshadow

2019-10-06 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 10/3/19 9:16 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: Hi, I've noticed that the documentation of -Wshadow=x has some missing bits, and I want to add an negative example to -Wshadow=compatble-local. Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is it OK for trunk? Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi =

Re: [PATCH] Update documentation of -Wshadow

2019-10-03 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/3/19 9:16 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that the documentation of -Wshadow=x has some > missing bits, and I want to add an negative example to > -Wshadow=compatble-local. > > > Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > Is it OK for trunk? > > > Thanks > Ber