Re: [PATCH] Update TARGET_FUNCTION_INCOMING_ARG documentation

2016-04-28 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/30/2015 03:35 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> >> On 11/29/2015 06:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> >>> Is this safe for stage 3? >> >> >> Is there a reason to do it now? This doesn't include a testcase. > > Handling the proposed attribute requires exte

Re: [PATCH] Update TARGET_FUNCTION_INCOMING_ARG documentation

2016-04-28 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/30/2015 03:35 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: On 11/29/2015 06:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: Is this safe for stage 3? Is there a reason to do it now? This doesn't include a testcase. Handling the proposed attribute requires extensions to the current function_arg capabilities. I need to go back to t

Re: [PATCH] Update TARGET_FUNCTION_INCOMING_ARG documentation

2015-11-30 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 11/29/2015 06:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: Is this safe for stage 3? Is there a reason to do it now? This doesn't include a testcase. * function.c (assign_parm_setup_stack): Force source into a register if needed. * target.def (function_incoming_arg): Update documentation