Hi Richard,
On 2023/9/8 14:37, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I think this should instead use poly_int_tree_p and wi::to_poly_widest.
There's no need to handle int64 and uint64 separately. (And there's no
need to handle just 64-bit types.)
Thanks for the correction. I used wi::to_poly_wide(instead
Lehua Ding writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds support that tries to fold `MIN (poly, poly)` to
> a constant. Consider the following C Code:
>
> ```
> void foo2 (int* restrict a, int* restrict b, int n)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < 3; i += 1)
> a[i] += b[i];
> }
> ```
>
> Before this patch:
>
Hi Andrew,
On 2023/9/8 13:28, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:25 PM Lehua Ding wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds support that tries to fold `MIN (poly, poly)` to
a constant. Consider the following C Code:
Does it make sense to handle max also?
At the moment I can't construct a C
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:25 PM Lehua Ding wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds support that tries to fold `MIN (poly, poly)` to
> a constant. Consider the following C Code:
Does it make sense to handle max also?
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> ```
> void foo2 (int* restrict a, int* restrict b, int n)
> {
>
