On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> From: "H.J. Lu"
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Cc: Joseph Myers , Paolo Bonzini
>> Bcc:
>> Subject: [PATCH] Support -fuse-ld=bfd and -fuse-ld=gold
>> Reply-To:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Binuti
Am 29.11.2012 10:10, schrieb Markus Trippelsdorf:
> Additionally, what is the rationale for this patch? IOW why isn't the
> following
> enough?
>
> x4 ~ # ln -f /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/git/ld.gold
> /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/git/ld
> x4 ~ # ld -v
> GNU gold (GNU Binuti
Am 29.11.2012 09:43, schrieb Richard Biener:
> Do we need to consider GNU ld and gold coming from different binutils versions
> and thus do we need two sets of linker feature tests at configure
> time?
both GNU ld and gold are built from the same sources. So it is likely that they
come from the sa
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2012.11.29 at 09:43 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > From: "H.J. Lu"
>> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> > Cc: Joseph Myers , Paolo Bonzini
>> >
>> > Bcc:
>> > Subject: [PATCH]
On 2012.11.29 at 09:43 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > From: "H.J. Lu"
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Cc: Joseph Myers , Paolo Bonzini
> > Bcc:
> > Subject: [PATCH] Support -fuse-ld=bfd and -fuse-ld=gold
> > Reply-To:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > B
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> From: "H.J. Lu"
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Joseph Myers , Paolo Bonzini
> Bcc:
> Subject: [PATCH] Support -fuse-ld=bfd and -fuse-ld=gold
> Reply-To:
>
> Hi,
>
> Binutils supports 2 linkers, ld.gold and ld.bfd. One of them is
> configur
