Re: [PATCH] Skip ubsan internal fns in tail-merge

2016-03-07 Thread Tom de Vries
On 07/03/16 12:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: OK for stage4 trunk if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds? Ok, with a minor nits. 2016-03-07 Tom de Vries PR tree-optimization/70116 * tree-ssa-tail-merge.c (merge_stmts_p):

Re: [PATCH] Skip ubsan internal fns in tail-merge

2016-03-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > OK for stage4 trunk if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds? Ok, with a minor nits. > 2016-03-07 Tom de Vries > > PR tree-optimization/70116 > * tree-ssa-tail-merge.c (merge_stmts_p): New function, factored out > of

Re: [PATCH] Skip ubsan internal fns in tail-merge

2016-03-07 Thread Tom de Vries
On 07/03/16 11:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: This patch implements that. Should the asan internal function (ASAN_CHECK) be handled in the same way, as suggested here ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00776.html )? OK for st

Re: [PATCH] Skip ubsan internal fns in tail-merge

2016-03-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > This patch implements that. > > Should the asan internal function (ASAN_CHECK) be handled in the same way, > as suggested here ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00776.html > )? > > OK for stage4 trunk if bootstrap and r