"Ulrich Weigand" writes:
> Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Ulrich Weigand" writes:
>> > The problem is not DImode LABEL_REFs, but rather VOIDmode LABEL_REFs when
>> > matched against a match_operand:DI.
>>
>> It'd be good to fix this in a more direct way though, rather than
>> hack around it. It's
Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Ulrich Weigand" writes:
> > The problem is not DImode LABEL_REFs, but rather VOIDmode LABEL_REFs when
> > matched against a match_operand:DI.
>
> It'd be good to fix this in a more direct way though, rather than
> hack around it. It's possible that the trick will stop
"Ulrich Weigand" writes:
> Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
>> +; Note: Although CONST_INT and CONST_DOUBLE are not handled in this
>> predicate,
>> +; at least one of them needs to appear or otherwise safe_predicate_mode will
>> +; assume that a DImode LABEL_REF is not accepted either (see genrecog.c).
>
>
On 12/11/2015 03:20 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The attached patch introduces wide int support to S/390 in order
> to resolve a test case failure in gcc.dg/pr68129_1.c that is
> caused by an assertion in
> simplify-rtx.c:simplify_const_binary_operation().
Applied with the change suggested by Uli. T
Dominik Vogt wrote:
> +; Note: Although CONST_INT and CONST_DOUBLE are not handled in this
> predicate,
> +; at least one of them needs to appear or otherwise safe_predicate_mode will
> +; assume that a DImode LABEL_REF is not accepted either (see genrecog.c).
The problem is not DImode LABEL_REF
