Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary sparc code attr.

2011-09-29 Thread David Miller
From: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:12:58 +0200 > On the other side, I'm surprised you don't need to prefix gcm_name with GCM: > - when you have more than one mode iterator in a pattern, IMHO you should > make it clear which mode you are talking about. Maybe it works, but which > one i

Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary sparc code attr.

2011-09-29 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:01:55AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > --- a/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > +++ b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > @@ -8148,17 +8148,16 @@ >[(set_attr "type" "edge")]) > > (define_code_iterator gcond [le ne gt eq]) > -(define_code_attr gcond_name [(le "le") (ne "ne") (gt "gt