On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 06:36:53AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> 2019-01-25 Bernd Edlinger
>
> * c-warn.c (check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member): Handle the case
> when rhs is of array type correctly. Fix handling of nested structures.
> Fix handling of indirect_ref tog
On 1/24/19 8:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 06:39:22AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> --- gcc/c-family/c-warn.c(revision 268195)
>> +++ gcc/c-family/c-warn.c(working copy)
>> @@ -2725,14 +2725,18 @@ static tree
>> check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member (tree type
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 06:39:22AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> --- gcc/c-family/c-warn.c (revision 268195)
> +++ gcc/c-family/c-warn.c (working copy)
> @@ -2725,14 +2725,18 @@ static tree
> check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member (tree type, tree rhs)
> {
>bool rvalue = true;
> +
On 1/23/19 4:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:10:38PM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> --- gcc/c-family/c-warn.c(revision 268119)
>> +++ gcc/c-family/c-warn.c(working copy)
>> @@ -2796,6 +2796,10 @@ check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_membe
>>if (context)
>>
On 1/23/19 4:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:10:38PM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> --- gcc/c-family/c-warn.c(revision 268119)
>> +++ gcc/c-family/c-warn.c(working copy)
>> @@ -2796,6 +2796,10 @@ check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_membe
>>if (context)
>>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:10:38PM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> --- gcc/c-family/c-warn.c (revision 268119)
> +++ gcc/c-family/c-warn.c (working copy)
> @@ -2796,6 +2796,10 @@ check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_membe
> if (context)
> break;
> }
> + if (TREE_CO
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 6:10 AM Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> unfortunately there are some more issues with -Waddress-of-packed-member,
> that show that my previous
> patch was not yet complete.
>
> That is a bogus warning, in C and C++ (see addition in test case 1), and a
> couple of missin
