On 10/16/21 5:27 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:53 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
wrote:
I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details, but
kept the file since it was showing unpleasa
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:50 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
> testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details, but
> kept the file since it was showing unpleasant behaviour.
>
> Most of the time is spent in callba
> On 16 Oct 2021, at 10:27, Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:53 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
>> testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details, but
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:53 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
> testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details, but
> kept the file since it was showing unpleasant behaviour.
>
> Most of the time is
On 10/15/2021 8:21 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 10/15/21 3:50 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details,
but kept the file since it was showing unpleasant behaviour.
Mos
On 10/15/21 3:50 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details, but
kept the file since it was showing unpleasant behaviour.
Most of the time is spent in callbacks from substit
On 10/15/2021 7:50 AM, Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote:
I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details, but
kept the file since it was showing unpleasant behaviour.
Most of the time is spent in call