, loc, new_rtx, in_group);
+ gcc_assert (change_p);
+}
as you suggested.
Could you take a look again?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-07-17 15:00
To: juzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer; rdapp.gcc; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Support non-SLP unordered
> @@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ void emit_vlmax_cmp_mu_insn (unsigned, rtx *);
> void emit_vlmax_masked_mu_insn (unsigned, int, rtx *);
> void emit_scalar_move_insn (unsigned, rtx *);
> void emit_nonvlmax_integer_move_insn (unsigned, rtx *, rtx);
> +//void emit_vlmax_reduction_insn (unsigned, rtx *);
Plz
: Friday, July 14, 2023 8:51 PM
To: kito.cheng
Cc: gcc-patches ; kito.cheng ;
palmer ; rdapp.gcc ; Jeff Law
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Support non-SLP unordered reduction
So to be safe, I think it should be backport to GCC 13 even though I didn't
have a intrinsic testcase to reprodu
So to be safe, I think it should be backport to GCC 13 even though I didn't
have a intrinsic testcase to reproduce it.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-07-14 20:38
To: 钟居哲
CC: GCC Patches; Kito Cheng; Palmer Dabbelt; Robin Dapp; Jeff Law
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Su
that it can only be reproduced by reduction auto-vectorization.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-07-14 20:38
To: 钟居哲
CC: GCC Patches; Kito Cheng; Palmer Dabbelt; Robin Dapp; Jeff Law
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Support non-SLP unordered reduction
於 2023年7月14日 週五 20:31 寫道：
Fro
於 2023年7月14日 週五 20:31 寫道：
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> This patch add reduc_*_scal to support reduction auto-vectorization.
>
> Use COND_LEN_* + reduc_*_scal to support unordered non-SLP
> auto-vectorization.
>
> Consider this following case:
> int __attribute__((noipa))
> and_loop (int32_t * __rest
