Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Removed unnecessary sign-extend for vsetvl

Hi Kito, On 2023/11/9 17:21, Kito Cheng wrote: Should we need a zero-ext version as well? It's not needed at the moment, since the sign_extend is currently used for both int32_t and uint32_t. I can't find a case where zero_extend would occur. -- Best, Lehua (RiVAI) lehua.d...@rivai.ai

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Removed unnecessary sign-extend for vsetvl

Should we need a zero-ext version as well? On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 9:39 PM Lehua Ding wrote: > > Committed, thanks Juzhe. > > On 2023/11/8 21:29, juzhe.zhong wrote: > > lgtm > > Replied Message > > From Lehua Ding > > Date 11/08/2023 21:27 > > Togcc-pat

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Removed unnecessary sign-extend for vsetvl

Committed, thanks Juzhe. On 2023/11/8 21:29, juzhe.zhong wrote: lgtm Replied Message FromLehua Ding Date11/08/2023 21:27 To gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai , kito.

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Removed unnecessary sign-extend for vsetvl

lgtm Replied Message FromLehua DingDate11/08/2023 21:27 Togcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Ccjuzhe.zh...@rivai.ai,kito.ch...@gmail.com,rdapp@gmail.com,pal...@rivosinc.com,jeffreya...@gmail.com,lehua.d...@rivai.aiSubject[PATCH] RISC-V: Removed unnecessary sign-extend for vsetvl