On 12/29/22 07:50, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
We have two issues around min/max here:
1. That it doesn't apply to the SImode abs case (which is due to
expand_abs_nojump() blindly testing for the current mode in smax_optab).
Mode testing is inherent in the optab query interface.
2. That we h
On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 19:18, Raphael Moreira Zinsly <
rzin...@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> The Zbb min/max pattern was not matching 32-bit sources when
> compiling for 64-bit.
> This patch separates the pattern into SImode and DImode, and
> use a define_expand to handle SImode on 64-bit.
> zbb-min-
On 12/29/22 05:23, Raphael Zinsly wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:36 PM Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/28/22 11:18, Raphael Moreira Zinsly wrote:
The Zbb min/max pattern was not matching 32-bit sources when
compiling for 64-bit.
This patch separates the pattern into SImode and DImode, and
use a
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:36 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/28/22 11:18, Raphael Moreira Zinsly wrote:
> > The Zbb min/max pattern was not matching 32-bit sources when
> > compiling for 64-bit.
> > This patch separates the pattern into SImode and DImode, and
> > use a define_expand to handle SI
On 12/28/22 11:18, Raphael Moreira Zinsly wrote:
The Zbb min/max pattern was not matching 32-bit sources when
compiling for 64-bit.
This patch separates the pattern into SImode and DImode, and
use a define_expand to handle SImode on 64-bit.
zbb-min-max-02.c generates different code as a result
