On 10/27/23 11:02, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/27/23 11:56, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
GCC recently changed to emit __riscv_restore_5 which causes this
testcase to fail.
This patch updates the regex to be more robust to change by accepting
any number after __riscv_save_ and __riscv_restore_.
gcc/test
On 10/27/23 11:56, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
GCC recently changed to emit __riscv_restore_5 which causes this
testcase to fail.
This patch updates the regex to be more robust to change by accepting
any number after __riscv_save_ and __riscv_restore_.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.targe
