On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:42 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> I'd like to back port this patch to GCC 8 and 9, should I send another
> patch mail or just wait ack from release manager?
I think it is only relevant to the gcc-9 branch. The buggy pattern
was added June 2018, which is a while after the gcc-8
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to back port this patch to GCC 8 and 9, should I send another
> patch mail or just wait ack from release manager?
Looks OK to backport since it only affects RISC-V and that's neither
a primary nor secondary arch and this looks like a wrong
Hi
I'd like to back port this patch to GCC 8 and 9, should I send another
patch mail or just wait ack from release manager?
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:48 PM Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> Fixes github.com/riscv/riscv-gcc issue #161. We were accidentally using
> BITS_PER_WORD to compute shift counts when
