On 7/9/24 12:30 PM, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
On 7/8/24 13:36, Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/8/24 1:25 PM, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Independent-
Predicates.html
| Function: const_int_operand
| This predicate allows any CONST_INT expression that fits
On 7/8/24 13:36, Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/8/24 1:25 PM, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Independent-Predicates.html
| Function: const_int_operand
| This predicate allows any CONST_INT expression that fits in
mode. It is an appropriate choice for an i
On 7/8/24 1:25 PM, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Independent-Predicates.html
| Function: const_int_operand
| This predicate allows any CONST_INT expression that fits in mode.
It is an appropriate choice for an immediate operand that does not allow
On 7/6/24 07:20, Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/3/24 3:16 PM, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
Regarding the amocas.q follow-up patch:
I'm having trouble with matching any TImode compare-and-swap
patterns. Here's the RTL I'm trying:
(define_mode_iterator SUPERGPR [SI DI TI])
(define_insn "zacas_atomic_cas_v
On 7/3/24 3:16 PM, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
Regarding the amocas.q follow-up patch:
I'm having trouble with matching any TImode compare-and-swap patterns.
Here's the RTL I'm trying:
(define_mode_iterator SUPERGPR [SI DI TI])
(define_insn "zacas_atomic_cas_value"
[(set (match_operand:SUPE
Regarding the amocas.q follow-up patch:
I'm having trouble with matching any TImode compare-and-swap patterns.
Here's the RTL I'm trying:
(define_mode_iterator SUPERGPR [SI DI TI])
(define_insn "zacas_atomic_cas_value"
[(set (match_operand:SUPERGPR 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
(match_ope
