Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests.

2023-11-09 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
I am using --with-arch=rv32gcv --with-abi=ilp32d I change dg-additional-option into dg-option of all those tests. Issues gone. juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Jeff Law Date: 2023-11-10 09:15 To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Robin Dapp; gcc-patches; palmer; kito.cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests.

2023-11-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/9/23 18:12, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote: How to fix it ? I am pretty noob on testing CI. Can Robin fix that? It's most likely a problem on your side with how you've configured the toolchain. I don't think this is somethign Robin can fix for you. jeff

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests.

2023-11-09 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
How to fix it ? I am pretty noob on testing CI. Can Robin fix that? juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Jeff Law Date: 2023-11-10 09:11 To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Robin Dapp; gcc-patches; palmer; kito.cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests. On 11/9/23 18:09, juzhe.zh

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests.

2023-11-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/9/23 18:09, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote: I am already using master branch. The FAIL is: xgcc: fatal error: Cannot find suitable multilib set for '-march=rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zifencei_zfhmin_zve32f_zve32x_zve64d_zve64f_zve64x_zvfh_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b'/'-mabi=lp64d' That's an multilib conf

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests.

2023-11-09 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
it can fix the issue. juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Jeff Law Date: 2023-11-10 07:58 To: 钟居哲; rdapp.gcc; gcc-patches; palmer; kito.cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests. On 11/9/23 15:43, 钟居哲 wrote: > Hi. Robin. [ ... ] You may need a development version of binutils to ge

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests.

2023-11-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/9/23 15:43, 钟居哲 wrote: Hi. Robin. [ ... ] You may need a development version of binutils to get the zfh/zvfh support and unreleased patches to get zfb/zvfb support. Probably the easiest thing to do would be to look in the gcc.log file at those failures and see what the excess failur