On 01/22/2012 10:16 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote:
May I regenerate libiberty/configure and check it in, or does that
require a libiberty maintainer?
Yes, regenerate everything that is affected.
Paolo
On 1/22/2012 4:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/01/2012 10:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote:
-i[[34567]]86-*-interix3*)
+i[[34567]]86-*-interix[[3-9]]*)
# Interix 3.x gcc -fpic/-fPIC options generate broken code.
# Instead, we relocate shared libraries at runtime.
;;
Is thi
Hello!
> Ping.
> Patch retested with 1/18/2012 sources.
>
>> On 1/1/2012 1:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote:
>>
>>This is for 32bit, "C" language only.
>>Tested by cross and then cross-native from x86_64 Linux
> Build parts are ok.
Looking at the patch, I didn't spotted anything obviously wrong
On 01/01/2012 10:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote:
-i[[34567]]86-*-interix3*)
+i[[34567]]86-*-interix[[3-9]]*)
# Interix 3.x gcc -fpic/-fPIC options generate broken code.
# Instead, we relocate shared libraries at runtime.
;;
Is this still true?
Build parts are ok.
Pa
Ping.
Patch retested with 1/18/2012 sources.
On 1/1/2012 1:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote:
This is for 32bit, "C" language only.
Tested by cross and then cross-native from x86_64 Linux
--Doug
