Re: [PATCH] Prune LTO warnings that some tests fail

2021-12-29 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 12/29/2021 2:13 AM, FX wrote: Hi, Did you mean to include the change pruning visibility warnings? I don't think it's necessarily wrong, it just doesn't match the patch description or ChangeLog. Yes, I think they should be applied, and will fix long-standing failures reported in https

Re: [PATCH] Prune LTO warnings that some tests fail

2021-12-29 Thread FX via Gcc-patches
Hi, > Did you mean to include the change pruning visibility warnings? I don't > think it's necessarily wrong, it just doesn't match the patch description or > ChangeLog. Yes, I think they should be applied, and will fix long-standing failures reported in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

Re: [PATCH] Prune LTO warnings that some tests fail

2021-12-28 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 12/26/2021 5:19 PM, FX via Gcc-patches wrote: The testcase g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on *-apple-darwin with: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C -O2 -flto (test for excess errors) Excess errors: lto-wrapper: warning: using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs The test otherwise works fi