On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Max Woodbury wrote:
> As for the sequence of comments you point to, they are discussing the
> use of __LINE__ in macros, not directives. The standard is quite a bit
> more explicit about token substitution in directives, making it fairly
> clear that substitution is not to oc
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Postpone __LINE__ evaluation to the end of #line
directives
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:32:41 -0500
From: Max Woodbury
To: Joseph S. Myers
On 11/28/2013 11:34 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Max Woodbury wrote:
There
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Max Woodbury wrote:
> There should be a way to change the __FILE__ value without changing the
> line number sequencing. Whatever that mechanism is, it should NOT
> introduce maintenance problems that involve counting lines of code.
I think that #line is mainly intended for u
On 11/27/2013 04:10 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On further consideration, I'm not convinced there's a bug here at all; I
don't think it's sufficiently defined in the standard what the current
token is for the purposes of line numbering when __LINE__ gets expanded to
be able to say that one or the
On further consideration, I'm not convinced there's a bug here at all; I
don't think it's sufficiently defined in the standard what the current
token is for the purposes of line numbering when __LINE__ gets expanded to
be able to say that one or the other value in a directive is wrong. As
far
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Max Woodbury wrote:
> On 11/27/2013 05:46 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at
> 05:29:22AM -0500, mtewoodb...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Max TenEyck Woodbury
> >
> > This patch is badly missing a description. You also want to mention
> > the PR number, if this
On 11/27/2013 05:46 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at
05:29:22AM -0500, mtewoodb...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Max TenEyck Woodbury
>
> This patch is badly missing a description. You also want to mention
> the PR number, if this fixes a bug. I guess this is to fix PR58687.
>
I
From 6c95593f684c120a0ea7ef6178401283f63250b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Max TenEyck Woodbury
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:48:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Postpone __LINE__ evaluation to the end of #line directives
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Copyright 2013 assigned to the Free Software Foundation
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, mtewoodb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Copyright 2013 assigned to the Free Software Foundation.
FWIW I don't see this in copyright.list yet. If you sent the paperwork
(whether paper mail or scans) to the FSF over a week ago and haven't had
it acknowledged, please chase up ass...@g
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:29:22AM -0500, mtewoodb...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Max TenEyck Woodbury
This patch is badly missing a description. You also want to mention
the PR number, if this fixes a bug. I guess this is to fix PR58687.
> Copyright 2013 assigned to the Free Software Foundation
10 matches
Mail list logo
