On 20/01/17 00:11 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/01/17 19:08 -0500, Tim Song wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
std::advance(__first, 1);
Why not just ++__first;?
Good question. I have no idea why I did it like that!
Fixed like so. Committed to trunk.
co
On 19/01/17 19:08 -0500, Tim Song wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
std::advance(__first, 1);
Why not just ++__first;?
Good question. I have no idea why I did it like that!
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> std::advance(__first, 1);
Why not just ++__first;?
