Re: [PATCH] PR64387

2015-02-04 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Ilya Tocar wrote: > I think that fix for avx2 part should be backported to 4.8/4.9 > What do you think? OK also for branches. Thanks, Uros.

Re: [PATCH] PR64387

2015-02-04 Thread Ilya Tocar
I think that fix for avx2 part should be backported to 4.8/4.9 What do you think? On 14 Jan 14:18, Ilya Tocar wrote: > Hi, > > This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64387 > Which was caused by different in predicates between vec_unpacks_hi > and vec_extract_hi. > Ok for tr

Re: [PATCH] PR64387

2015-01-14 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Ilya Tocar wrote: > On 14 Jan 12:36, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Ilya Tocar wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64387 >> > Which was caused by different in predicates between vec_unpac

Re: [PATCH] PR64387

2015-01-14 Thread Ilya Tocar
On 14 Jan 12:36, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Ilya Tocar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64387 > > Which was caused by different in predicates between vec_unpacks_hi > > and vec_extract_hi. > > Why are vec_unpacks_hi_{

Re: [PATCH] PR64387

2015-01-14 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Ilya Tocar wrote: > Hi, > > This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64387 > Which was caused by different in predicates between vec_unpacks_hi > and vec_extract_hi. Why are vec_unpacks_hi_{v8sf,v16sf} expanders different than vec_unpacks_hi_