RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-31 Thread Bingfeng Mei
Thanks, Jeff. Checked in. Bingfeng > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: 31 July 2014 04:43 > To: Bingfeng Mei; Richard Biener > Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 > > On 07/30/14 09:20, Bin

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Jeff Law
On 07/30/14 09:20, Bingfeng Mei wrote: Yes, that fix is better. Here are updated patches. LTO-bootstrapped and tested. OK? Bingfeng Index: ChangeLog === --- ChangeLog (revision 213152) +++ ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,1

RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Bingfeng Mei
foo (100); + return 0; +} +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\.gnu\.lto.*.12345" } } */ > -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: 30 July 2014 14:08 > To: Bingfeng Mei > Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject:

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:46:48AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote: > > Hi, > > Please find the patches for pr61868. The problem is that even with > > -frandom-seed gcc always uses 0 instead of specified number/string for > > places such as lto

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Richard Biener
called with flag_random_set == true. Richard. > Bingfeng > >> -Original Message- >> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43 >> To: Bingfeng Mei >> Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: R

RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Bingfeng Mei
; flag_random_seed = val; + init_random_seed (); return old; } Bingfeng > -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43 > To: Bingfeng Mei > Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 > > On

RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Bingfeng Mei
It did take a lot of time, but passed the LTO bootstrap. Bingfeng > -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43 > To: Bingfeng Mei > Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 &

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Richard Biener
t; -Original Message- >> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 30 July 2014 08:47 >> To: Bingfeng Mei; Andi Kleen >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 >> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng

RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Bingfeng Mei
? Bingfeng > -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: 30 July 2014 08:47 > To: Bingfeng Mei; Andi Kleen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote: > Hi, > Please find the patches for pr61868. The problem is that even with > -frandom-seed gcc always uses 0 instead of specified number/string for places > such as lto section names. init_random_seed is never called with > -frandom-seed. Boo