Re: [PATCH] PR58985: testcase error.

2013-11-06 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Wei Mi wrote: > +Release manager. > > Thanks, committed to trunk as r204438. Ok for 4.8 branch? Ok. > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 11/04/13 12:07, Wei Mi wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is to fix testcase error reported in PR58985. >>> >

Re: [PATCH] PR58985: testcase error.

2013-11-05 Thread Wei Mi
+Release manager. Thanks, committed to trunk as r204438. Ok for 4.8 branch? On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/04/13 12:07, Wei Mi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This is to fix testcase error reported in PR58985. >> >> The intention of the testcase was to ensure there was no REG_EQ

Re: [PATCH] PR58985: testcase error.

2013-11-05 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/04/13 12:07, Wei Mi wrote: Hi, This is to fix testcase error reported in PR58985. The intention of the testcase was to ensure there was no REG_EQUIV notes generated for a reg which was used in a paradoxical subreg. When target was x86, there was subreg generated so I omitted to add the su