Re: [PATCH] PR tree-optimization/108697 - Create a lazy ssa_cache

2023-02-16 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:34 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote: > > > On 2/16/23 02:55, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:07 PM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > >> This patch implements the suggestion that we have an alternative > >> ssa-cache which does not zero memory, and in

Re: [PATCH] PR tree-optimization/108697 - Create a lazy ssa_cache

2023-02-16 Thread Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
On 2/16/23 02:55, Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:07 PM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: This patch implements the suggestion that we have an alternative ssa-cache which does not zero memory, and instead uses a bitmap to track whether a value is currently set or not. It

Re: [PATCH] PR tree-optimization/108697 - Create a lazy ssa_cache

2023-02-16 Thread Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
On 2/16/23 08:55, Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:07 PM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: This patch implements the suggestion that we have an alternative ssa-cache which does not zero memory, and instead uses a bitmap to track whether a value is currently set or not. I

Re: [PATCH] PR tree-optimization/108697 - Create a lazy ssa_cache

2023-02-15 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:07 PM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: > > This patch implements the suggestion that we have an alternative > ssa-cache which does not zero memory, and instead uses a bitmap to track > whether a value is currently set or not. It roughly mimics what > path_range_quer