On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:38:11PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek writes:
>
> Jakub> Also, as this effectively requires the latest unreleased GDB under the
> Jakub> default options for something that has been working previously, I
> wonder
> Jakub> if it e.g. for some
> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek writes:
Jakub> Also, as this effectively requires the latest unreleased GDB under the
Jakub> default options for something that has been working previously, I wonder
Jakub> if it e.g. for some time shouldn't be guarded with dwarf_version >= 5
Here's what that looks
> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek writes:
Jakub> I admit I haven't looked at the GDB changes, but how will the debugger
know
Jakub> if it is an emutls emulation or normal ELF TLS, if the same op is used
Jakub> in both cases?
Because gdb never implemented DW_OP_form_tls_address, that emultls case
h
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:17:33AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This patch changes gcc to emit DW_OP_form_tls_address rather than
> DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address. This is PR debug/77315.
>
> DW_OP_form_tls_address was added in DWARF 3, and this patch uses the
> DWARF version to decide which opcode to
