On 5/21/19 7:08 AM, James Clarke wrote:
> On 26 Apr 2019, at 15:24, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 4/26/19 2:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 08:58:18AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:52 PM James Clarke wrote:
>
> By using ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL, r2575
On 26 Apr 2019, at 15:24, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 4/26/19 2:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 08:58:18AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:52 PM James Clarke wrote:
By using ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL, r257511 forced the assembler to start a new
bu
On 4/26/19 2:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 08:58:18AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:52 PM James Clarke wrote:
>>>
>>> By using ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL, r257511 forced the assembler to start a new
>>> bundle when emitting an inline entry label on. Instea
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 08:58:18AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:52 PM James Clarke wrote:
> >
> > By using ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL, r257511 forced the assembler to start a new
> > bundle when emitting an inline entry label on. Instead, use
> > ASM_OUTPUT_DEBUG_LABEL like for t
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:52 PM James Clarke wrote:
>
> By using ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL, r257511 forced the assembler to start a new
> bundle when emitting an inline entry label on. Instead, use
> ASM_OUTPUT_DEBUG_LABEL like for the block begin and end labels so tags are
> emitted rather than labels.
L
